The project brings together archival and recordkeeping, social work and early childhood education researchers at Monash University with colleagues at the Collaborative Research Centre in Australian History (CRCAH) at Federation University Australia to take up the challenge of re-imagining recordkeeping and archival systems in support of responsive and accountable child-centred out-of-home care and as an enabler of historical justice and reconciliation.
Co-design and protoyping
Working with those with Care experiences to model and protoype lifelong recordkeeping and archiving needs
Rights Charter for Childhood Recordkeeping
Developing a suite of rights in and to records for identity, memory and accountability purposes
Recordkeeping Principles survey
Capturing views on capacities to implement recordkeeping principles for child safety and wellbeing
Exploring relationships between justice, memory, agency and the archives through time
The project has a number of investigative streams:
In designing the Lifelong Living Archives we are building a rich, in-depth picture of the lifelong recordkeeping needs of children and young people in Care. We need to understand the ways in which they, as well as care givers, case workers, teachers, health professionals, communities, and families will contribute to and interact with their records. An in-depth design of this type is best achieved through a co-design process. With co-design, stakeholders come together in various combinations to present and discuss ideas of how a Lifelong Living Archives should work. It is through the views, understanding, and experience of differing system stakeholders that a comprehensive design is achieved.
Records of Care
This involves discussions with Care-leavers about the records of their time in out-of-home Care. We are interested in identifying the different types of records; their format, form, and structure; their purpose; and the kinds of systems from which they come. We are not concerned with the specific details of any documents, but we are interested in views about which records are important, relevant, and useful, as well as which are unimportant, unhelpful, and/or inaccurate. We are also interested in thoughts about what is missing and should be included and what could be changed.
Child Centred Design
This phase of the project is concerned with gaining an understanding of the design of person-centred innovations that have emerged in the sector over recent years. It involves discussions with professionals who have worked as members of design, development, or implementation teams for person-oriented systems in the provision of out-of-home Care and/or for access to records of past Care experiences. This will inform the conceptualisation and design of Lifelong Living Archives as a complex, participatory information ecology. This study involves discussion about design, development, and implementation experiences to learn out about project design goals and compromises; barriers and insights; and the scope, affordances, and constraints of the application developed.
Values, Principles and Rights
There is repeated evidence that whole childhoods spent in care went undocumented, with some never even being issued with a birth certificate. In order to unpack why making and keeping personal records about children of the state is never core business, a historical perspective is needed from which we can discern values and principles, even if the means of their identification is through examples of their violation.The issues with recordkeeping in out-of-home-Care, are, in fact, symptomatic of a constellation of deeper problems that relate to the political and social purpose and function of the welfare. Similarly, an education perspective (and, in particular, innovative thinking in Early Childhood Education) informs the project by upholding the rights of the child in terms of wellbeing and social justice, recognising holistic and alternative approaches to pedagogy and learning, and considering the ethics of researching with young children. In the out-of-home Care context, studies of recordkeeping literacy are vital to ensure meaningful participation across stakeholder communities in the formation, management and use of the Lifelong Living Archive. This is the first project in the world to explore this concept in the out-of-home Care context as a key to facilitating a child centred care model.
One output from this work will be a robust Rights Charter – a statement of rights that that declares individual Identity, Memory, and Accountability rights and maps them to specific recordkeeping rights in Participation; Access; Privacy and Safe Recordkeeping; and Proactive Disclosure. To this effect, the projectis developing a draft Charter for Rights in Records, drawing on a variety of sources including philosophy of the child, historical justice values and principles, human rights statements; existing charters of children’s rights; legal instruments; policy and practice; Care-leaver, support services, and advocate experiences; and community expectations.
This phase of the project aims to capture views on capacities to implement the Recordkeeping Principles for Child Safety and Wellbeing recommended by the Australian Government’s Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (RCIRCSA) and the Records Access Principles and Guidelines developed in 2015 as part of the DSS’s suite of Find & Connect Services and Projects.
We would like to build an evidence base of how these principles are being applied, any barriers to their adoption, and the issues that surface when trying to do so. The study is undertaking an anonymous survey, reflecting on respondents’ roles and that of their organisation in relation to implementing the principles. We plan to repeat this survey on an annual basis to chart capacities to implement childhood safe recordkeeping principles in the out of home care sector.
- Evans, J., & Wilson, J. Z. (2018). Inclusive archives and recordkeeping: towards a critical manifesto. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1–4. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428671
- Rolan, G., Evans, J., Bone, J., Lewis, A., Golding, F., Wilson, J. Z., McKemmish, S., Mendes, P., Reeves, K. (2018). Weapons of Affect: the imperative for transdisciplinary Information Systems design. In 81st ASIS&T Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 436–445). Vancouver: Association for Information Science and Technology.
- Wilson, J. Z., & Golding, F. (2018). The tacit semantics of ‘Loud Fences’: tracing the connections between activism, heritage and new histories. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(8), 861–873. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1325767
- Wilson, J. Z., Mendes, P., & Golding, F. (2018). Hope Street: From Voice to Agency for Care-Leavers in Higher Education. Life Writing, 1–13. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2018.1427420
- Evans, J., McKemmish, S., & Rolan, G. (2017). Critical approaches to archiving and recordkeeping in the continuum. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(2). Available at http://libraryjuicepress.com/journals/index.php/jclis/article/view/35
Rights in Records by Design is funded through an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Grant DP170100198. The Chief Investigators on this project are Associate Professor Joanne Evans (Monash University), Associate Professor Jacqueline Wilson (Federation University), Professor Sue McKemmish (Monash University), Associate Professor Philip Mendes (Monash University), Professor Keir Reeves (Federation University), and Dr Jane Bone (Monash University)
Associate Professor Joanne Evans’s involvement is also funded through an ARC Future Fellowship FT140100073 – Connecting the Disconnected: Co-Designing Inclusive Archival and Recordkeeping Systems.